| Executive Summary
The proposed Family Farm Protection Act is designed to:
-
Make small farms more economically viable and promote healthy local rural
economies
-
Level the playing field and eliminate special treatment of large-scale
livestock operations
-
Ensure adequate environmental protection
The Act would substantially reform the current agricultural production
system to eliminate market practices which unfairly benefit large-scale
operations over small farms. The Act builds upon the existing environmental
permitting system and uses the federal Clean Water Act threshold of 1,000
animal units to define a point source of pollution. It provides cost-sharing
dollars to help small farms come into compliance with environmental standards.
The Act specifically directs subsidies and other government assistance
to small farms and away from large-scale operations.
The following outline is the product of ten months of consensus based
deliberations among leaders from the following organizations: WI Farmers
Union, Family Farm Defense Fund, WI Rural Development Center, Sierra Club,
WI Environmental Decade, American Raw Milk Producers Pricing Association,
Churches Center for Land and Peoples, The Catholic Conference, Lutheran
Office on Public Policy in WI, WISPIRG, and Wisconsin Citizen Action.
(The WSN was represented at the discussions by steering committee member
Caryl Terrell.)
Family Farm Protection Act - Major Policy Components
I. Collusive and Anti-Competitive Practices
a) Require study of the degree of concentration in the livestock and
grain industry and its social/economic impacts on small farms and small
communities.
WHEN STUDY IS COMPLETED: Refer to DOJ-AG for investigation
Develop, finance and maintain within the state Attorney General office
an agricultural anti-trust division to litigate and prosecute anti-competitive
practices within the livestock and grain processing industry. WHEN STUDY
IS COMPLETED: Provide sufficient resources and personnel to the state Attorney
General office to work with the U.S. Dept. of Justice to address possible
violations/abuses of the Capper/Volstad and Packers and Stockyards Acts.
II. Price and Market Reform
a) Require mandatory price reporting for all sales of livestock, livestock
products and grain whether sold by auction, contract or other means.
(See Nebraska bill provided.)
III. Development of Produced-Owned Processing
a) Provide assistance in the development of farmer-owned livestock
products, grain processing and storage facilities.
b) Provide a system of financial assistance for marketing of
products for farmer-owned processing facilities.
c) Assist in the development of marketing strategies for independent
family farmers.
IV. Credit and Agricultural Financing Reform
a) Require WHEDA lenders to use loan servicing and forbearance
policies to the fullest extent possible.
b) Restore operating loan interest assistance subsidies to the
WHEDA CROP program and expand current WHEDA Beginning Farmer program.
V. Family Farm Education Programs
a) Devote half of all UW Extension funding resources to study
and promote practices that encourage minimal environmental impact and low-cost
farm management practices such as grazing.
b) Fund site-specific/on-farm technical education programs conducted
by UW Extension.
c) Establish an independent board to provide oversight to and
monitor DATCP and UW research programs.
d) Fund, expand & promote educational programs that encourage beginning
farmers with special focus on minorities and low-income individuals.
VI. Tax Incentives and Disincentives
a) Property tax exemption for agricultural waste lagoons shall
be restricted to farms under 1000AU.
b) Sales exemption on electrical use should be restricted to farms
under 1000AU.
VII. Environmental Standards for Large-scale Operations
a) Define livestock operations over 1,000 animal units as industrial
facilities.
b) Require Performance Bonding.
c) Integrator Liability.
d) Eliminate preemption on local governments enacting stricter
siting/environmental laws than state.
e) Mandatory nutrient management plan.
f) Mandatory nutrient management certification.
g) Cost sharing dollars are to be directed to small farms and
will not be made available to industrial operations.
h) Environmental Impact Statement is required for proposed livestock
factories located in watersheds impaired by agricultural runoff and in
sensitive environmental areas such as groundwater susceptible areas and
near trout streams.
i) Apply Air Standards to industrial livestock facilities.
j) Open Records: All documents related to permit and discharge
monitoring should be open to public.
k) Enforcement: Adequate enforcement must be established.
l) Ban industrial livestock facilities within the subwatershed
of Trout Streams classified as I, II or III quality.
m) Require wastewater treatment facilities for industrial livestock
facilities, i.e. WPDES.
n) Phase out existing lagoons that do not comply with standards.
o) Implement "Purchase of Development Rights" legislation.
This would allow any farmer to sell the development rights to their property
to a land trust.
p) Ban liquid animal waste spraying through aerial irrigation
systems.
VIII. Small Farm Environmental Issues
a) Provide cost share funding for any state or federally required nutrient
management plans on small farms.
b) Give priority to small farms when disbursing any state or federal
cost-sharing money for any state or federally required implementation of
nutrient management practices.
c) Provide/shift funding for a local "first response" program
to County Conservation Departments.
d) Preserve "Right to Farm" legislation for small farms only.
e) Provide funds for on-farm research and lower cost alternatives
for small farms.
For more information, please contact Sam Gieryn, WI
Citizen Action, 122 State St. #308, Madison, WI 53703, or call
608-256-1250, or email Sam.
|