|
|
|
8/6/01
|
Public
hearings before the state Public Service Commission (PSC) on the proposed
345,000 volt electric transmission line across northern Wisconsin have
ended. The controversial proposal would stretch 250 miles across
Wisconsin (ending outside of Wausau) and is the largest voltage powerline
allowed under state law.
The Arrowhead-Westin Transmission Project - as it’s
called in utility speak - has encountered intense resistance from landowners,
state energy activists and affected Indian tribes while garnering the support
of utilities, big business and key public officials (like Governor McCallum).
About 10,000 pages of testimony were entered into the formal hearing transcript during the legal tussle over the line. Supporters and opponents of the project expect the three PSC Commissioners to reach a decision on the construction permit by late August or early September.
Steve Hiniker, the executive director for the Citizens’ Utility Board (CUB), doubts the line is needed. And he says the project’s chief utility sponsor, Green Bay-based Wisconsin Public Service, did a poor job of proving their case. “They thought all they had to do was show-up and they would get their approval,” Hiniker says. “Unfortunately,” he adds, “they may be right.”
Hiniker credits the utility with doing a good job
of whipping up their supporters. He also notes the existing climate
of fear surrounding a potential energy shortage as another factor working
in the utility’s favor.
When plans for the 345,000 volt line were first developed
several years ago, the state was living under the shadow of electrical
blackouts. Hot, humid weather torched Wisconsin during the summer
of 1997 while the state’s electric generating capacity was hobbled by prolonged
repairs afflicting the aging nuke plants on Lake Michigan’s shoreline.
Ilinois’ own headaches with their offline nuclear
powerplants sucked additional electricity from the badgerland, worsening
Wisconsin’s electrical reliability and sparking sporadic brownouts across
the eastern side of the state.
A nervous Governor Thompson and utility officials
persuaded the state legislature to respond. They passed a package
of energy policy proposals aimed at shoring up electrical supplies in eastern
Wisconsin and the state’s transmission infrastructure.
A flurry of new powerplant proposals were generated
with several receiving a construction thumbs up from the PSC. Over
10,000 megawatts of new electrical power has been proposed, notes Hiniker.
An amount, he says, “more than doubling the exiting energy [supply] in
eastern Wisconsin.”
Wisconsin
Public Service (WPS) remains unfazed by the surge in new electrical
capacity, and continues to insist they need their $175 million transmission
project to serve their customers. “This is the best possible
solution,” says company spokesman Todd Steffen. “We still need a
method to transfer power to where it’s needed.”
“We’ve moved beyond 1997,” says Linda Ceylor.
Ceylor is a dairy farmer from the Rusk County community of Catawba and
part of SOUL
(Save Our Unique Lands). Like many of SOUL’s members, her land
sits under a corridor proposed for the 345,000 volt line.
Ceylor says that WPS’ original proposal assumed no
new power plants would be built. Mentioning the string of 90 degree
days that hit the state in June and July, she asks: “Where’s the
warning for blackouts?” The lack of warnings, Ceylor answers, is
a clue. “Maybe the problem got solved.”
“We’ve been holding up, but just getting by on those
hot days,” responds Steffen. “We’ve reached electrical peaks every
year for the past five years.”
Ceylor thinks WPS has a more compelling reason for
their powerline proposal. “They are looking at the bulk transfer
of electricity,” she says. “It’s not a secret.”
Ceylor argues that the utility hopes to sell the juice
to Chicago and other power hungry portions of the U.S. A line the
size of WPS’ proposal can transmit about 2000 megawatts of power, or the
equivalent of 4 conventional coal plants.
But the power doesn’t appear out of thin air, it has
to come from somewhere and at the end of the extension cord live the Pimicikamak
Cree of northern Manitoba. Vast areas of Cree Indian land have
been submerged for hydro power development along the Nelson River system.
Manitoba’s provincial utility has been eagerly seeking buyers for the surplus
hydro electricity.
The Cree’s traditional lands are mostly flat, forested
expanses. Lacking natural dikes and geologic barriers, the dams built
on the Nelson River have flooded inordinately huge tracts of the wooded
back country. Disruptions caused by water fluctuations make it difficult
for Cree trappers and fishers to feed their families.
“Our traditional navigation, fishing, and hunting
grounds are being destroyed,” was the message Ernest
Monias, a member of the Pimicikamak Cree, brought to Wisconsin last
year.
Monias’ home town of Cross Lake (about 6000 people)
has an unemployment rate near 95 percent and one of the highest suicide
rates of any Indian community in Canada.
Trying to halt the bleeding, the Pimicikamak Cree
entered the PSC hearings hoping to block construction of the transmission
line and halt further sales of Manitoba’s hydro electricity.
Regardless of the power source, WPS and other state
utilities have asserted that an additional line is needed across
northwestern Wisconsin as a system back-up for the lone 345,000 volt line
running into Eau Claire. “We really have an overburdened transmission
from the west,” explains Steffen.
“Expert transmission engineers can demonstrate that
these needs can be met without building a 345kV line,” Hiniker says.
One alternative he suggests is upgrading existing lines along existing
powerline right-of-ways to meet transmission system concerns.
Ceylor, who attended all of the technical hearings
before the PSC, concurs. “It’s not so much a lack of energy, but
the energy not flowing properly,” she says.
Following the conclusion of the PSC’s hearings (most
of which were not attended by a PSC Commissioner), SOUL sought to put a
public face on their intense opposition. On June 7, they brought
a couple of buses and a hundred people to Madison for the weekly open meeting
of the three Commissioners.
SOUL presented the Commissioners with more than 1000
signed documents from landowners potentially impacted by the line that
said they would not grant a construction easement. In addition to
the land owned by many private parties, the PSC’s Environmental Impact
Statement indicates that the 250 mile route would cross 53 rivers, wetlands,
and hiking trails between Duluth and its Wausau endpoint.
Despite their efforts and the winning case she believes
they presented, Ceylor doesn’t sound optimistic. “There’s an awful
lot of learning to do here,” she says, noting the low hearing attendance
by the Commissioners and the 10,000 page transcript. “We’ve got a
hell of a case. It’s too bad that it goes in front of the three Commissioners.”
Hiniker’s more blunt. “I think that this Commission,”
he says, “will approve the Arrowhead-Westin line and we will go directly
to court.” He cites a missing engineering plan, unexpected powerplant
construction, and the failure to adequately explore energy conservation
and alternative energy sources as grounds for contesting the decision.
Convinced that these issues will tie the project up
in court, Hiniker offers his own energy forecast: “I wouldn’t look
for any juice to be flowing over a line between Duluth and Weston anytime
in the next decade.”