|
Previous Action Alerts |
|
|
ACTION
ALERT! You
can submit written comments on
the Arrowhead-Weston
Transmission
Line Until August 29, 2004
The
Public Hearing was held on August 19, but you still have time to give the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) feedback on the negative impacts of the proposed
Arrowhead-Weston transmission line on the wetlands and other features of the
national scenic riverways the proposed line would cross.
Submit a letter to the Corps by August 29 expressing your concerns about
the environmental impacts of the proposed line. Comments should be mailed to: St. Paul District, Corps of Engineers For more information:
ACTION ALERT! Public Hearing on Arrowhead-Weston Transmission Line August 19, 2004 From: Todd Hanson [mailto:stewardship@wsn.org] The
time is NOW to give the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) feedback on the negative impacts of the proposed
Arrowhead-Weston transmission line on the wetlands and other features of the
national scenic riverways the proposed line would cross. A single public
comment session has been scheduled for next week, so there are two actions
you can take:
1. Attend the only Public Hearing held by the Army Corps: Public Hearing
August 19, 2004 2.
Submit a letter to the Corps by August 29 expressing your concerns about
the environmental impacts of the proposed line. Comments should be mailed to:
St. Paul District, Corps of Engineers BACKGROUND
You will remember that the WDNR once recommended that the A-W line not be built along its proposed path due to the line’s impacts on forests, wetlands, and rivers. Despite this, the Public Service Commission (PSC) issued a Certificate of Public Need (which carries the power of eminent domain) to build the line. This certificate is currently being contested by Clean Wisconsin and SOUL who contend that the certificate was wrongly granted by the PSC. They contend the PSC did not follow its own rules to wait until the WDNR had issued its permits before issuing the certificate. The Corps should not compound this error. The Corps should be urged to wait until the after this appeal of the PSC’s action before deciding on the line. Other points of objection to the Corp’s environmental impact statement are contained in a comment submitted by Gaylord Nelson and others. The WSN has posted Gov. Nelson’s comment at http://www.wsn.org/transmission_line/deis_comments_052704.pdf Finally, Sandy Lyon of WSN member group Anishinaabe Niijii/Protect the Earth will be happy to talk with anyone interested about the A-W line's environmental impacts in areas where the Corps has jurisdiction. Sandy has followed this very closely, and she suggests that before you call her at (715) 766-2725, you visit http://www.protecttheearth.org/Gaylord%20Nelson%201.htm to learn more about the wild places of the northwest that Gaylord Nelson seeks to protect from the destruction of the proposed Arrowhead 345,000 volt transmission line. Todd
Hanson For more information:
Sign on Letter to Governor Doyle to From Derek Scheer, Water Policy Director for Clean Wisconsin On Monday July 19th the Council of Great Lakes Governors, led by Wisconsin’s Governor Doyle, released two draft documents designed as a contract between the eight Great Lakes states and two Canadian provinces of Ontario and Quebec. These documents are the first step in drafting laws that will affect how your Great Lakes water is used by the agriculture industry, manufacturing, businesses, and municipalities. One document is a good-faith agreement between the 10 states and provinces. The other document is a compact (called the Great Lakes Basin Water Resources Compact) to enhance joint decision making about the use of Great Lakes water. Both the agreement and the compact are designed to protect, conserve, restore, and improve the waters and water-dependent natural resources of the Great Lakes Basin. Now is the time to take action and help protect your Great Lakes. Ask Governor Doyle to ensure that Wisconsin has more than one hearing on these two very important documents. Also, please tell Governor Doyle, before October 17, 2004, to strengthen the compact as noted in Clean Wisconsin's Press Release.You can contact Governor Doyle at 608.266.1212 or governor@wisconsin.gov. More details and a prewritten letter to Governor Doyle, can be found at http://www.cleanwisconsin.org/campaigns/doyle_GL_letter.html For more information read the Press Release:
ACTION ALERT: ACT 118 Hearings Need Our Support For recent news articles about ACT 118 see http://www.wsn.org/jobs_creation_act/index.html#Media When the Job Creation Act of 2003 (Act 118) passed last year, the DNR began developing rules to implement that law. When it came to water resource provisions, two major things had to be defined -- which waters would be considered “Areas of Special Natural Resource Interest” and when/how “general permits” would be issued for activities along navigable waters. Now those rules are up for hearings at locations across Wisconsin, and we can show our support for them. Hearings are set for: Tuesday, July 27: NOTE - Meeting places for July 27 have changed to these locations listed below to accommodate more people. Room N 133, North View Building, 1500 University Drive, UW-Waukesha,
Waukesha
Wednesday, July 28 July 28: Old Library OL1132, UW-Eau Claire, 105 Garfield
Avenue, Eau Claire Thursday, July 29 July 29: Boardroom A &B, Wis. Indianhead Tech College-Shell Lake Campus, 505 Pine Ridge Drive, Shell Lake Tuesday, August 3 August 3: Room 332, Pyle Center, UW-Madison, 702 Langdon
Street, Madison Three weeks ago the Legislature’s Joint Committee to Review Administrative Rules (JCRAR) suspended portions of the “emergency rules” that had been in place. The JCRAR felt some of the emergency rules went too far in requiring DNR permit review (all along backers of Act 118 had wanted as many water permits as possible to be “general” permits to expedite their construction and building projects). This JCRAR action sent the various interest groups (including the Governor’s office) back to the table, and they are still there as of this e-mail. George Meyer of the WI Wildlife Federation has been involved in these discussions on behalf of the environmental/conservation community, and he is confident the final rules brought to the hearings will be something that makes the best of a bad situation. Like it or not, we have entered an era of general water permits in Wisconsin, and these permits may not get the kind of review from the DNR we’d like to see to ensure water resources are not impaired. But the recommendation from George Meyer at this time is: “support the rules as written to make the best of a bad situation.” The WSN can get you more information about the rules and talking points for your appearance at one of the hearings. Just let me know. I hope you pass this information along to your group members so someone from your organization can attend a hearing in your area. Todd Hanson ACTION ALERT: The ESA Under Attack - Please Call Resources Committee Members and Urge Opposition to Anti-Endangered Species Bills. For more information see http://www.wsn.org/esa_alert_070604.html ACTION ALERT! Members of the Wisconsin Legislature are threatening state rivers and lakes by attempting to suspend rules written by the DNR for the Jobs Creation Act of 2003. The Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules (JCRAR) has scheduled a Public Hearing for June 24 in Minocqua: 11:00am
at the Minocqua Community Also See the Hearing Notice. The
purpose of the Hearing is to suspend many
of the rules that DNR has adopted pursuant to the Jobs Creation Act of
2003 to assure the protection of Wisconsin lakes and streams.
JCRAR is going after the heart of the Act 118 rules, those rules
defining "areas of special natural resource interest",
"public rights features" and "priority navigable waters"
and section NR 1.016 which defines the DNR's responsibilities to implement the public trust doctrine. They are also
going Your attendance is needed at this Public Hearing to voice your support for retaining the rules written by the DNR for the Jobs Creation Act. For more information about the Jobs Creation Act see: Jobs
v. environment? Panel eyes suspending DNR emergency rules - June 22, 2004 CapTimes
Action Alert! Make Your Voices Heard on
the Siting Review Board! From: "Felicia Lin" <advocate@midwestadvocates.org> Subject: Action Alert! Make Your Voices Heard on the Siting Review Board! Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:08:24 -0500 On April 13, 2004, Governor Doyle signed the Livestock Siting Bill into law
for Wisconsin. While this legislation is a step
backward for local democracy and sustainable agriculture, it is
not too late to make sure we have a voice in livestock siting
decisions.
The Bill creates a 7-member Livestock Siting Review Board which has the power to overturn a local government's decision to approve or deny a permit for a livestock factory. The Siting Review Board will be appointed by the secretary of DATCP and will consist of:
Midwest Environmental Advocates will submit a list of recommendations to DATCP in an attempt to ensure that the Review Board is informed, diverse and represents the interests of family farmers and local residents. If you know of someone who you think would be a valuable addition to the Review Board, let us know so that we can include them in our recommendations. With 4 seats potentially open to us to fill, it is critical that we send in as comprehensive of a list as possible. We can still work together to protect and preserve Wisconsin's thousands of
dairy farms, as well as the health and safety of Wisconsin residents. Let's
continue to promote the local decision-making process by making our voices heard
on the Siting Review Board. Felicia Lin
Action Alert! Call on Governor Doyle to Veto AB 868 and Protect Our Local Democracy! Last week, the Senate voted to pass AB 868, a divisive attempt by industrial agri-business to promote polluting livestock factories in Wisconsin and limit citizen participation in local decisions and appeals. This undemocratic bill now sits on Governor Doyle's desk, waiting to be signed. Instead, let's tell the Governor that AB 868 is just waiting to be vetoed. Now is the time to call Governor Doyle's office and encourage him to uphold Wisconsin's tradition of family farming, environmental protection and local zoning control. You can reach the Governor's office at (608) 266-1212. You can also send letters to the editors of your local paper publicly asking the Governor for this important veto. Below are some talking points you can use when drafting letters and speaking with the Governor's office:
We still have the opportunity to make our voices heard in the Capitol. Together, we can protect and preserve our local decision-making process, family farmers and right to clean air and water. Felicia Lin Help Protect Wisconsin's Lakes and Streams
Please take action by March 23, 2004 From: "Wisconsin InterNetwork" <win@conservationvotersinstitute.org> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 15:07:41 -0600 As you recall, despite our many efforts to the contrary, the so-called ‘Jobs Creation Act’ of 2003 recently passed. The bill removed many of the protections from the statutes that protected our lakes and streams, including provisions that protected fish and wildlife habitat, natural scenic beauty and water quality. When this bill was signed into law, Governor Doyle and Legislative
leaders Next Wednesday, the Natural Resources Board is taking up the
necessary Please don’t miss this opportunity to use your voice to protect
Wisconsin’s Deadline for responding: To send a message, please click the link below: http://win.e-actionmax.com/showalert.asp?aaid=582 The following organizations are participating in this campaign: 1000 Friends of Wisconsin Rally for a Responsible
Energy Policy A rally to oppose
the promotion of nuclear power and waste disposal in Wisconsin. Organizations Opposed to Nuclear Power and Waste
Storage in Wisconsin Clean
Wisconsin
Illegal Transmission Line – Landowners in Midway Township,
Minnesota are calling for your help to stop the illegal construction on their
lands by Minnesota Power/ATC. Rally
Sunday, February 29 at 11 AM. The
utilities are going onto people’s lands while they are away and DRILLING when
they have no permit. SOUL, Save Our
Unique Lands, is asking you to help stand in solidarity with these brave
landowners who are saying no to this OUTLAW company.
SOUL has received a legal opinion that the company does not have the
power to take this illegal action and TAKE land (this is the Minnesota leg of
the northern Wisconsin 345,000 volt transmission line).
SOUL will be presenting this legal opinion to the television cameras.
SOUL of Midway is begging for your help.
The Arrowhead 345,000 volt OUTLAW line is truly “The War at Home.”
It is the first transmission line3 to be built in WI-MN by a private for
profit electric line utility that THINKS it has the power of eminent domain, and
ratepayers are the ones footing the bill (even paying for all those horrible
ads on the radio!!).
Springbrook, WI USA - Thursday, February 26, 2004 at 11:58:11 (CDT) A Statewide conference on Global Warming, At the Tipping Point: From Global Warming to Global Stability, will be held in Oshkosh on Feb. 8-9. Sponsored by the Wisconsin Interfaith Climate and Energy Campaign, the conference will promote next steps in Earth Stewardship. The conference will be held at the UW-Oshkosh campus. For more information, email or call Dave Steffenson at 920-623-4360. You can also find conference updates at www.wicec.org. Wisconsin Interfaith Impact Madison, WI USA - Friday, January 16, 2004 at 3:50:11 (CDT) The Wisconsin Wetlands Association and the Wisconsin Woodland Owners Association present Wooded Wetlands on January 30-31 in Mosinee. The gathering includes a science forum, field trips, a silent auction and a banquet. Discussions include the connection between hydrology and habitat, animals of wooded wetlands, types of wooded wetlands and their restoration. Field trips will visit the Mead Bottomland Floodplain Forest, the Mead Swamp Natural Area, and Nine-Mile Swamp. For registration details and lodging information, call 608-250-9971 or visit http://www.wiscwetlands.org/wausau.htm . Madison, WI USA - Friday, January 2, 2004 at 11:45:21 (CDT)
The Department of Natural Resources is hosting public listening sessions on proposed changes to the Shoreland Zoning rule, NR115. The DNR says the rule change is necessary to facilitate the revision of county shoreland zoning ordinances, introduce a level of flexibility for property owners and to address the current weaknesses in the statewide minimum standards. Their goal, they say, is to reflect the needs of our citizens while continuing the dedication to the protection of our natural resources. Attend a listening session and provide your input. You can choose between two identical meetings (2-5:30pm, 5:30-9pm) for each of these dates: November 11 - Spooner Agricultural Resource Center; November 12 - Lake Tomahawk Community Building; November 13 - Eau Claire DNR Regional Headquarters; December 1 - Onalaska City Hall; December 3 - Crivitz Village Hall (Tenative;)December 4 - Grande Chute Town Hall; December 9 - Madison at the DATCP Board Room; December 11 - Waukesha County Board Room. color="#990000"> The DNR is also seeking public comments on such issues as Minimum Lot Sizes, Impervious Surface Limit, Nonconforming Lots, Setback Averaging, Nonconforming Structures, and Shoreland Setbacks and Buffers. For more information, visit www.theshorelandconnection.org. If you are concerned about the proposed 345,000 volt Duluth to Wausau transmission line, now is the time to send your comments to the Public Service Commission. They are holding new hearings on the project since its cost doubled to more than $400 million. They will accept public comments from Sept. 16-24. color="#990000"> You can mail them to Jim Lepinski, Docket Coordinator Public Service Commission of Wisconsin P.O. Box 7854 Madison, Wisconsin 53707-7854. For more information, check out the Transmission Line page in the WSN issues section. Will Fantle <wfantle@sbcglobal.net> Eau Claire, WI USA - Friday, September 12, 2003 at 15:47:25 (CDT) Act now to Reduce Mercury Pollution: For years, Clean Wisconsin and dozens of other hunting and fishing, conservation and environmental groups have been working to control mercury pollution in our lakes and rivers. Today, you have an opportunity to help. Please contact Senator Kedzie, chair of the Senate Committee on Environment and Natural Resources and Representative Johnsrud, chair of the Assembly Committee on Natural Resources Resources and let them know you support rules to reduce mercury pollution (Rule CR-01-181) without further delay or weakening. Remember to copy or call your own Senator and Representative as well. color="#990000"> This would be particularly important if they are a member of one of the Committees. (Members: Senators Stepp, Zien, Risser and Wirch. Representatives Gunderson, Ott, Pettis, Bies, Krawczyk, M. Williams, Black, Gronemus and Huber). Contact legislators by calling the legislative hotline 1-800-362-9472 or 1-800-228-2115 TDS or log onto www.legis.state.wi.us and go to the legislators web page. On August 13th, Clean Wisconsin staff along with other concerned citizens, medical professionals and representatives from other organizations presented testimony and spoke in support of the mercury reduction rule (CR-01-181). We asked the Committee to reject efforts to further weaken the rule and to strengthen the rule by including: A 90% reduction of current mercury pollution from coal plants; A measurement of mercury reductions from what is coming out of the power plant smokestacks, NOT from the mercury that is in the coal; and A 150% offset for new sources of mercury. Its time to protect our lakes, the fish we eat, and our children’s health from toxic mercury pollution. Help us put strong mercury rules in place. Liz Wessel <lwessel@cleanwisconsin.org> Madison, WI USA - Friday, August 15, 2003 at 15:29:45 (CDT) You may have already sent a comment on the Chequamegon/Nicolet Forest Plan, but the ATVers are bombarding the NF website, so we are asking concerned citizens who want to keep ATVs out of the Chequamegon/Nicolet National Forest to send this email to everyone on their email list. Ask your friends to use any of the comments in the attached letter, or write their own. Anyone in the country may comment. Time is of the essence, the comment period closes on August 11, 2003. Please take a moment to send your comment-it could save the largest piece of public land in Wisconsin. Thanks, Merrill Horswill. Written comments can be submitted by: E-mail to: chequamegonnicolet@fs.fed.us or Mail to: Chequamegon-Nicolet Forest Plan Revision DEIS, P.O. Box 221090, Salt Lake City, UT 84122-1090 Fax to: 801-517-1014 color="#990000"> Merrill Horswill <nirvanas3@yahoo.com> Presque Isle, WI USA - Wednesday, August 06, 2003 at 16:47:14 (CDT) I would like to notify all scientists and engineers who hold Masters of Science degree or higher in a climate-related field, of the opportunity to sign a letter which will be delivered to the U.S. Senate on Tuesday (July 29th, AM), and is intended to confirm for U.S. Senators that there exists scientific consensus on the scientific findings of the IPCC conderning the phenomenon of global warming. Global warming is predicted to significantly and adversely impact Wisconsin's air, land, water, biological and human resources, as well as such resources in other geographic areas of the U.S., and other geographic areas, for decades and centuries to come..... The U.S. Senate is scheduled to begin their deliberations on the all-important issue of global warming/climate change sometime next week. The impetus for beginning this debate will be the offering of several climate change-related amendments to Senate energy bill S-14, The Energy Policy Act of 2003, and that the ensuing debate in the Senate could influence federal climate policy for the foreseeable future. U.S. senators need to be made aware of the broad consensus that exists among many of the nation's scientists having knowledge of the climate and impacts, particularly in light of the fact that misinformation has been circulated to Senate office recently that falsely claims "there is no scientific consensus on climate change" and that there has been "a targeted media campaign" waged by organizations having a vested interest in the outcome of the climate debate designed to give the impression that scientific consensus is lacking on the climate issue". The complete UCS message is attached. Individuals who wish to sign the letter to the Senate should have at least a master's degree in a field that is relevant to climate science or impacts (including engineering). Those who decide to sign the letter need only do the following: email your name, degree, title, department and institution (for identification purposes, only), as well as their city and state to: .... < ssi@csusa.org >. ....... Individuals who do not meet the above qualifications but who wish to contribute are being asked to forward the UCS message to others they know who might meet the qualifications and be willing to sign the letter...... The names of individuals submitting the above information will automatically become part of the sign-on letter, which will be delivered to the Senate early next week. UCS is asking that replies of prospective signatories be emailed to UCS as soon as possible, but NO LATER THAN MONDAY, JULY 28TH, BY NOON - EASTERN TIME (11:00 AM, CENTRAL) to be processed in time to for delivery to the Senate on Tuesday morning. --------- Forwarded message ---------- To: (Message Recipient) We contact you today with a very important and time-sensitive appeal. The US Senate is about to spend a considerable amount of time discussing global climate change. The impetus for this debate will be the offering, expected next week, of several climate change-related amendments to the Senate's energy bill (S-14, The Energy Policy Act of 2003). This climate change debate is widely recognized to be a "test" of the political strength of the senators who are concerned about the issue, and the debate is thus likely to influence federal climate policy for the foreseeable future. The stakes are high. It is vitally important that the Senators debating this issue have a clear and accurate understanding of the current status of climate change science. Unfortunately, several recent efforts to misrepresent the state of the science have been circulated to Senate offices. These efforts include, for example: * a publication from the Senate's Republican Policy Committee on climate change, which stated "there is no scientific consensus on climate change" and then recycled several outdated criticisms of climate change science; * widespread attention to two recent, subsequently rebutted, articles that challenge the view that the late-20th century warming is unprecedented over the past millennium; and a targeted media campaign designed to give the impression that scientific consensus is lacking on the climate issue. One effective method for countering the above attacks, which are clearly intended to influence the Senate debate, is a strong, public show of support from the scientific community on this issue. A letter with many expert signers will make it difficult for the climate skeptics to advance one of their standard counters -- which is, that rebuttals to skeptic attacks represent only the opinions of individual authors rather than more general scientific agreement. The skeptics have also been dismissing documents such as the IPCC's Third Assessment Report as merely past scientific consensus that has been weakened by recent research. To present the strongest possible opinion to the Senate as it deliberates on the climate change issue, a sign-on letter is being circulated among the climate science community, clarifying for the Senate the state of scientific agreement on climate change. Please consider joining your colleagues in this effort, and make your opinion known to the senate. ** The letter is appended below for your review and possible signature. Please note that the letter is intended as a scientific statement; it makes no endorsement for or against any particular legislation. This is a good time to stand up and be counted against the obfuscation and dissembling of those who wish to maintain the status quo of heavy fossil fuel use. Please feel free to contact us with any questions. Sincerely, Jason Mathers Sound Science Initiative Project Assistant Union of Concerned Scientists Two Brattle Sq Cambridge, MA 617 547 5552 ssi@ucsusa.org *** HOW THE LETTER WILL BE USED The letter will be delivered to Senate offices on Tuesday July 29th. It may be read into the Senate record, referenced in Senate remarks, or otherwise used in the debate. It may also be referenced in media accounts of the senate debate. *** HOW TO SIGN ONTO THE LETTER If you are a scientist or engineer holding at least a master's degree in a field that is relevant to climate science or impacts, please consider signing the letter. After your review, you can add your signature by simply emailing your name, degree, title and department, institution (for identification purposes only), city and state to < ssi@ucsusa.org >. When you send us your authorizing email, your name will automatically become part of the sign-on letter that will be delivered to the Senate early the week of July 28. *** HELP CIRCULATE THE LETTER You can help by circulating this request to colleagues within the US whom you think would be interested and meet the criteria to sign on. But be sure to forward this request TODAY! *** DEADLINE The timing here is absolutely urgent, as the letter will be delivered to the Senate the morning of Tuesday, July 29th. We would appreciate your reply as soon as possible, but no later than Monday July 28th at noon Eastern Time. *** THANK YOU! Thank you for considering this request. You and your scientific colleagues have an important role to play as our country grapples with complex questions about climate change mitigation, adaptation, and energy security. Current attempts to distort the debate must be challenged, and sound information on climate change should guide federal policymaking. ******************************************** July 29, 2003 United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senators Frist and Daschle: Two years have elapsed since the publication of the most recent reports by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the National Research Council (NRC) on the state of the science of climate change and its impacts on the United States and the rest of the world. As scientists engaged in research on these subjects, we are writing to confirm that the main findings of these documents continue to represent the consensus opinion of the scientific community. Indeed, these findings have been reinforced rather than weakened by research reported since the documents were released. In brief, the findings are that: 1) Anthropogenic climate change, driven by emissions of greenhouse gases, is already underway and responsible for most of the observed warming over the last 50 years -- the largest warming that has occurred in the Northern Hemisphere during at least the past 1000 years; 2) Over the course of this century the Earth is expected to warm an additional 2.5 to 10.5 0F, depending on future emissions levels and on the climate sensitivity -- a sustained global rate of change exceeding any in the last 10,000 years; 3) Temperature increases in most areas of the U.S. are expected to be considerably higher than these global means because of our nation's northerly location and large average distance from the oceans; 4) Even under mid-range emissions assumptions, the projected warming would cause substantial impacts in the U.S., including an increased likelihood of heavy and extreme precipitation events, exacerbated drought, and sea level rise; 5) Almost all plausible emissions scenarios result in projected temperatures that continue to increase well beyond the end of this century, raising the possibility of eventual devastating impacts such as the disintegration of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, leading to widespread coastal inundation; and, 6) Due to the long lifetimes of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, the longer emissions increase, the faster they will ultimately have to be decreased in order to avoid dangerous interference with the climate system. Evidence that climate change is already underway includes the instrumental record, which shows a surface temperature rise of approximately 10F over the 20th century, the accelerated sea level rise during that century relative to the last few thousand years, global retreat of mountain glaciers, reduction in snow cover extent, earlier thawing of lake and river ice, the increase in upper air water vapor over most regions in the past several decades, and the 0.090F warming of the world's deep oceans since the 1950's. Evidence that the warmth of the Northern Hemisphere during the second half of the last century was unprecedented in the last 1000 years comes from three major reconstructions of past surface temperatures, which used indicators such as tree rings, corals, ice cores, and lake sediments for years prior to 1860, and instrumental records for the interval between 1865 and the present. On the subject of human causation of this warmth, the NRC report stated that, "The IPCC's conclusion that most of the observed warming of the last 50 years is likely to have been due to the increase in greenhouse gas concentrations accurately reflects the current thinking of the scientific community on this issue." Indeed, computer simulations do not reproduce any of the late 20th century warmth if they include only natural climate forcings such as emissions from volcanoes and solar activity. The warmth is only captured when the simulations include forcings from human-emitted greenhouse gases present in the atmosphere. In summary, the main conclusions of the IPCC and NRC reports remain robust consensus positions supported by the vast majority of researchers in the fields of climate change and its impacts. The body of research carried out since the reports were issued tends to strengthen their conclusions. Sincerely, [Requested Signatures] ***THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS*** The Union of Concerned Scientists is a nonprofit partnership of scientists and citizens combining rigorous scientific analysis, innovative policy development, and effective citizen advocacy to achieve practical environmental solutions. To learn more about UCS, please visit us on the web at: < http://www.ucsusa.org >. Michael Neuman Michael Neuman <mtneuman@juno.com> USA - Friday, July 25, 2003 at 20:52:46 (CDT) The Wisconsin groups that have been protecting the watersheds of the Fox and Wolf Rivers from metallic mineral mining have joined forces with the Front 40 Environmental Fight of Upper Michigan. They have formed a WI/MI Watershed Alliance. There will be a Public Forum on Saturday, July 26th, at the Marinette, WI High School Auditorium from 2 - 5 PM. Please plan on attending. Upper Michigan's counties of Menominee and Marquette are facing metallic mineral mining on their major rivers that flow into the Great Lakes. The major mining companies are American Copper and Nickel, a subsidiary of INCO and Kennecott. Michigan's laws for permitting of mineral mines were changed in 1998-99 to allow ease of permitting by the state DNR and DEQ. PLEASE ATTEND THE FORUM ON JULY 26th ! Mary Nitkowski <marykins@dreamscp;com> Stephenson, MI USA - Sunday, July 20, 2003 at 21:23:26 (CDT)
Opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent those of the Wisconsin Stewardship Network or our funders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|