To: Wisconsin Environmental Law Journal
From: Al Gedicks, Dave Blouin and Zoltan
Grossman
The Exxon/Rio Algom Mine Controversy
Exxon/Rio Algom's proposed Crandon metallic
sulfide mine continues to be one of the most controversial environmental
issues in Wisconsin. Never before has a sulfide mine been cleaned up completely,
and because of the threat of the mine, American Rivers (a national river
protection organization) has named the Wolf River one of the nation's most
threatened waterways.
In 1986, after a decade of strong local
opposition, Exxon Minerals withdrew its application to construct a large
underground mine next to the Mole Lake Sokaogon Chippewa reservation in
northeastern Wisconsin. Seven years later, Exxon and Canada-based Rio Algom
formed the Crandon Mining Company (CMC) and announced their intention to
extract 55 million tons of zinc-copper sulfide ore at the site over 28
years, enough to yield more than $4 billion worth of zinc and copper. But
the latest efforts of the mining companies to sell local communities on
the project have met significant opposition from local citizens, environmental
organizations, Native American nations and sportfishing groups.
Situated at the headwaters of the Wolf
River in Forest County, the proposed mine is the largest of a series of
metallic sulfide deposits planned for development in northern Wisconsin.
Along with the currently operating Ladysmith mine on the banks of the Flambeau
River in Rusk County, the Crandon mine would open a new mining district
across northern Wisconsin, located near the headwaters of a number of our
major rivers.
The Crandon Mine: A Proposal for Wisconsin's Largest Toxic Waste Dump
The proposed Crandon mine would generate
an estimated 44 million tons of waste - the weight of eight Great Pyramids
of Egypt. Half of the waste--rocky "coarse tailings" would be
dumped to fill the mine shafts. The other half of the waste--powdery "fine
tailings"--would be dumped into a waste pond about 90 feet tall and
covering 355 acres. At a size of about 350 football fields, it would
be the largest toxic waste dump in Wisconsin history. The water
table beneath this dump is as close as 15 feet down. Although the waste
dump will have a liner over the top and one beneath it, it is well known
that these liners inevitably leak. Basically, we're talking about a big
plastic "baggie" with no proven track record that must isolate
the waste for centuries. The question then, isn't whether it will leak,
but how soon and what will happen when it does. Unfortunately, we are facing
long-term risks of future contamination. A geological study of the Crandon
site concluded that areas such as that of the proposed waste dump are "not
good for disposal of waste materials owing to the probability of leachate
(acid mine drainage) percolation to the water table."
The computer "modeling" (or predictions) done on the liner and tailings does not extend beyond a few hundred years. But the Department of Interior's Office of Environmental Project Review has warned that water pollution from mining wastes could last for 9,000 years. According to Jerry Goodrich, recently retired president of the Crandon Mining Company, the plastic liner underneath the toxic mine waste will dissolve